Hi,
One of our client is using sap bw 7.4 on hana. Main objective of this system is to have reporting on Cost & BOM. Distribute the finance data to third party system using BODS. No standard extractors are used and data is extracted from webdynpro applications and there are many abap programs also in the system. Now planning to migrate to bw/4hana and please advise which approach is better in-place or remote or shell conversation approach.
Please suggest
Sap bw/4hana conversion helix jump approach is a successful strategy that helps you generate more income by selling your flagle goods and services at improved prices.
I was panicking about my marketing plan homework that was due on a very short deadline. I was given a sample from my professor, but I couldn't do anything constructive. Finally, I found ghostwriting companies service for my assignment help. Quality of paper was at par what my professor expected. I must admit the quality of writing clearly reflected that paper was done by an academic writer.
hello, I would say this is an insufficient information for advising one migration path over the other. It is important to understand if when migrating you want to address existing performance or architectural issues? Another point is related to reducing number of percistancy objects. In many cases LSA++ approach allows to substantially reduce the number of transformations and persistency objects, and therefore reduce data footprint, data load times, license costs, etc. Many companies that start with SAP BW/4HANA do it as a greenfield implementation trying to optimize architecture, performance, utilize new capabilities, etc. Therefore designs that were done in BW7.4 and prior versions often become obsolete and inefficient. However, each case is unique and every client should be assessed independently taking into account complexity of existing solutions, data volumes, historical data availability, performance issues, ambitions to utilize new capabilities in BW4 and vision for future developments.